If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley Central
and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue in service
to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't hold up all
the following trains while the driver walks all the way down to the back
and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

In message , Clive D. W. Feather
writes
If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley Central
and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue in service
to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't hold up all
the following trains while the driver walks all the way down to the
back and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

Yes, they've done away with the guards who only walked from the back to
the front.
--
Clive.

Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley Central
and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue in service
to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't hold up all
the following trains while the driver walks all the way down to the back
and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any hold
up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

wrote:
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley Central
and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue in service
to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't hold up all
the following trains while the driver walks all the way down to the back
and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any hold
up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

East Finchley has four platform faces, two of which lead solely to
Highgate depot (thus any trains in these platforms do not block
following trains) whilst Finchley Central has just two (where
terminating trains do block following trains).

--
Dave Arquati
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley Central
and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue in service
to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't hold up all
the following trains while the driver walks all the way down to the back
and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any hold
up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

East Finchley has four platform faces, two of which lead solely to
Highgate depot (thus any trains in these platforms do not block following
trains) whilst Finchley Central has just two (where terminating trains do
block following trains).

What he said.

In article ,
Dave Arquati wrote:
wrote:
But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any hold
up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

East Finchley has four platform faces, two of which lead solely to
Highgate depot (thus any trains in these platforms do not block
following trains) whilst Finchley Central has just two (where
terminating trains do block following trains).

Pedantically, Finchley Central has three plaform faces; two of which
can be used by southbound trains (I think: can a north-to-south
reversal be done by a train running south from platform 2? I'll
have to look now; you've made me curious).

--
I don't play The Game - it's for five-year-olds with delusions of adulthood.

In article , Mike Bristow
writes
Pedantically, Finchley Central has three plaform faces; two of which
can be used by southbound trains (I think: can a north-to-south
reversal be done by a train running south from platform 2?

No, it can't. I'm 96% sure (the signalling plan isn't with me) that the
arrangements a

Platform 1: enter from East Finchley, Mill Hill East, or south siding;
exit to Mill Hill East or north siding.
Platform 2: enter from East Finchley or south siding;
exit to Mill Hill East, High Barnet, or north siding.
Platform 3: enter from Mill Hill East, High Barnet, or north siding;
exit to East Finchley or south siding.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

"Clive D. W. Feather" wrote
Mike Bristow writes
Pedantically, Finchley Central has three plaform faces; two of which
can be used by southbound trains (I think: can a north-to-south
reversal be done by a train running south from platform 2?

No, it can't. I'm 96% sure (the signalling plan isn't with me) that the
arrangements a
[almost accurate details snipped]

I'm amused by your "96%". Most people would have typed 90 or 99 without
thinking about the accuracy. How did you arrive at 96?

Quail suggests you can't get to 1 from the south siding.

In article om,
() wrote:

Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
If you're planning to detrain a southbound service at Finchley
Central and run it empty to Highgate depot, why not let it continue
in service to East Finchley and detrain it there? That way you won't
hold up all the following trains while the driver walks all the way
down to the back and then to the front again.

Or is there a logical explanation for this instruction?

But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any
hold up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

Why do I think someone doesn't know the track layout at East Finchley?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

But how would going one extra stop and then detraining avoid any
hold up? It would just mean the hold up would be delayed by a couple of
minutes.

Why do I think someone doesn't know the track layout at East Finchley?

Hey thats why I was asking! The basic answer would have to be, there
is a reason. Whether its obvious to punters or not, LU aren't going to
cause chaos just for fun.

Like its been said, it was quite possibly a defective train, and in
such instances it would be unsafe to keep the train in customer service.