London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 08:34 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,920
Default So much for a 4% rise

Used the tube today - a 3.60 fare has gone up to 3.80. Thats 5.5%. Is there
some rule in LU that the fares have to be rounded up to the nearest 10 pence?
What the hell is the point of having a smartcard system if its less flexible
than cash? Useless money grabbing *******s.

B2003


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 11:14 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 267
Default So much for a 4% rise

On 4 Jan, 09:34, wrote:
Used the tube today - a 3.60 fare has gone up to 3.80. Thats 5.5%. Is there
some rule in LU that the fares have to be rounded up to the nearest 10 pence?
What the hell is the point of having a smartcard system if its less flexible
than cash? Useless money grabbing *******s.

The week I started work in the West End (nineteen sixty something) the
fare from Waterloo to Piccadilly Circus was 3d (just over 1p). A week
later there was an increase. It went up to 6d (2.5p). I guess TfL
and its predecessors never looked back!
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 11:24 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,920
Default So much for a 4% rise

On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:14:40 -0800 (PST)
77002 wrote:
later there was an increase. It went up to 6d (2.5p). I guess TfL
and its predecessors never looked back!


No doubt back then they were coming out with the same old guff about needing
it for service improvements which are "just around the corner! Honest guv!".
Arthur Daley would be embarrassed to do to his customers what TfL do to its
passengers on a daily basis. Still, I'm back in the car next week so **** em.

B2003

  #4   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 11:49 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 267
Default So much for a 4% rise

On 4 Jan, 12:24, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:14:40 -0800 (PST)

77002 wrote:
later there was an increase. *It went up to 6d (2.5p). *I guess TfL
and its predecessors never looked back!


No doubt back then they were coming out with the same old guff about needing
it for service improvements which are "just around the corner! Honest guv!".
Arthur Daley would be embarrassed to do to his customers what TfL do to its
passengers on a daily basis. Still, I'm back in the car next week so **** em.

One sympathises with your sentiment. From my perspective, my time in
the UK is enhanced by not driving.
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 12:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,920
Default So much for a 4% rise

On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:49:33 -0800 (PST)
77002 wrote:
On 4 Jan, 12:24, wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:14:40 -0800 (PST)

77002 wrote:
later there was an increase. =A0It went up to 6d (2.5p). =A0I guess TfL
and its predecessors never looked back!


No doubt back then they were coming out with the same old guff about need=

ing
it for service improvements which are "just around the corner! Honest guv=

!".
Arthur Daley would be embarrassed to do to his customers what TfL do to i=

ts
passengers on a daily basis. Still, I'm back in the car next week so ****=

em.

One sympathises with your sentiment. From my perspective, my time in
the UK is enhanced by not driving.


Don't get me wrong - I don't find driving to work in the car enjoyable. The
north circular is a hideous road. But its cheaper , quicker, more comfortable
and far fewer abnormal delays. In fact the one time the road was completely
stuffed and I ended up crawling along in a 6 mile jam it was still a few
minutes quicker than the normal non delayed tube journey. For anything other
than into central london the tube is hopeless. As for the NLL which I tried
once, ye gods - a horse and cart would have been quicker!

B2003



  #6   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 03:48 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 236
Default So much for a 4% rise

On 2013-01-04 13:47:41 +0000, d said:

a horse and cart would have been quicker!


That's because a horse would take one look at you and bolt, ah.

E.

  #7   Report Post  
Old January 4th 13, 11:29 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

As a frequent and enthusiastic motorist, I agree that travelling by car is
usually cheaper, quicker and more comfortable. That's why I despise those
anti-motor car bigots who insist that no-one needs a motor car in London.

I am however surprised that you find the North Circular so bad. Although TfL's
two enhancement projects have both turned out to be complete failures and
a disgraceful waste of money, I still find the A406 a fairly good road. Living in
Leyton, I am of course adjacent to the best stretch of the road.
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 5th 13, 02:33 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 351
Default So much for a 4% rise

In article , wrote:
Used the tube today - a 3.60 fare has gone up to 3.80. Thats 5.5%. Is there
some rule in LU that the fares have to be rounded up to the nearest 10 pence?
What the hell is the point of having a smartcard system if its less flexible
than cash? Useless money grabbing *******s.


You have to realise Boltar that you're above average in *every* respect,
not just those you assumed.

Nick
--
"The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
-- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 5th 13, 10:20 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 836
Default So much for a 4% rise


"Robin9" wrote in message
...

d;135285 Wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:49:33 -0800 (PST)
77002
wrote:-
On 4 Jan, 12:24, wrote:-
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:14:40 -0800 (PST)

77002 wrote:-
later there was an increase. =A0It went up to 6d (2.5p). =A0I guess
TfL
and its predecessors never looked back!-

No doubt back then they were coming out with the same old guff about
need=-
ing-
it for service improvements which are "just around the corner! Honest
guv=-
!".-
Arthur Daley would be embarrassed to do to his customers what TfL do to
i=-
ts-
passengers on a daily basis. Still, I'm back in the car next week so
****=-
em.-
-
One sympathises with your sentiment. From my perspective, my time in
the UK is enhanced by not driving.-

Don't get me wrong - I don't find driving to work in the car enjoyable.
The
north circular is a hideous road. But its cheaper , quicker, more
comfortable
and far fewer abnormal delays. In fact the one time the road was
completely
stuffed and I ended up crawling along in a 6 mile jam it was still a
few
minutes quicker than the normal non delayed tube journey. For anything
other
than into central london the tube is hopeless. As for the NLL which I
tried
once, ye gods - a horse and cart would have been quicker!

B2003


As a frequent and enthusiastic motorist, I agree that travelling by car
is
usually cheaper, quicker and more comfortable. That's why I despise
those
anti-motor car bigots who insist that no-one needs a motor car in
London.

I am however surprised that you find the North Circular so bad. Although
TfL's
two enhancement projects have both turned out to be complete failures
and
a disgraceful waste of money, I still find the A406 a fairly good road.
Living in
Leyton, I am of course adjacent to the best stretch of the road.


precisely.

Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are the
pits

tim


  #10   Report Post  
Old January 5th 13, 11:31 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default So much for a 4% rise

In message , at 11:20:20 on Sat, 5 Jan
2013, tim..... remarked:

I am however surprised that you find the North Circular so bad.
Although TfL's two enhancement projects have both turned out to be
complete failures and a disgraceful waste of money, I still find the
A406 a fairly good road. Living in Leyton, I am of course adjacent
to the best stretch of the road.


precisely.

Try the section through Ealing and the junction with the A1, they are
the pits


Hence the meme that the traffic news saying "avoid the North Circular"
is futile, because anyone who can possibly avoid it, already is.
--
Roland Perry


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Capital Connect fare rise last weekend? DaveP London Transport 0 May 21st 07 07:25 PM
Mayor says no tax rise for Games alex_t London Transport 30 March 19th 07 01:21 PM
T&G defends London bus drivers against rise in complaints Solid Scot London Transport 0 June 14th 05 10:17 PM
24% LU fare rise Adrian London Transport 10 January 13th 05 12:09 AM
BBC News: Congestion charge may rise to £8 Fustanella London Transport 0 November 30th 04 01:56 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017