Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
Paul Cummins wrote:
In article , (David Splett) wrote: Indeed. I find it amazing how much time people will devote to avoiding being caught by speed cameras, surely outweighing any time saved by being able to drive faster. I think it's something to do with the fact that 80% of British dual carriageways are of a better standard that German Autobahnen, but have slower, and often unreasonably slower, speed limits. How am I endangering anyone by doing 80-90 down the M6 at 3am on a clear morning? What has breaking the speed limit got to do with safety? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
"loobyloo" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:43:19 +0000 (UTC), Paul Scott wrote: I suppose one radical solution would be to obey the road traffic laws. -- Cliff Laine, The Old Lard Factory, Lancaster http://www.loobynet.com * remove any trace of rudeness before you reply * Arrrgh listen to old self righteousness Lardface out there, - Obey the road traffic laws? oh sure and thats why the overwhelming majority of us *real* people out there find the wretched things things anything but a safety measure and purely as a device to earn revenue? Easy money in other words. Most Dual Carriageway speed limits should be removed anyway cos no pedestrians are involved usually most are barrier proofed with footbridges or traffic lights these days. So why even HAVE a 50 say for instance suddenly turn into a 40 or even 30 on a Dual Carriageway with perfectly good barriers to safeguard the pedestrians? Reason? to catch the motorists out, thats what. redtube |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
"redtube" wrote in message
... "loobyloo" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:43:19 +0000 (UTC), Paul Scott wrote: I suppose one radical solution would be to obey the road traffic laws. -- Cliff Laine, The Old Lard Factory, Lancaster http://www.loobynet.com * remove any trace of rudeness before you reply * Arrrgh listen to old self righteousness Lardface out there, - Obey the road traffic laws? oh sure and thats why the overwhelming majority of us *real* people out there find the wretched things things anything but a safety measure and purely as a device to earn revenue? Easy money in other words. Most Dual Carriageway speed limits should be removed anyway cos no pedestrians are involved usually most are barrier proofed with footbridges or traffic lights these days. So why even HAVE a 50 say for instance suddenly turn into a 40 or even 30 on a Dual Carriageway with perfectly good barriers to safeguard the pedestrians? Reason? to catch the motorists out, thats what. Yes, a lot of main roads near where I live (Oxfordshire) have recently been downgraded to 50 (or are about to be downgraded) "to reduce the number of traffic accidents". This is solving the right problem in the wrong way: to avoid collisions, you need to penalise the person who *causes* the accident, typically a driver who is on a minor road who pulls out into fast-moving traffic without assessing its speed or the pedestrian who crosses the road without regard for the traffic, rather than penalising (by imposing a draconian speed limit) the driver who is in the right and who has priority. Children are a special case, and a 40, 30 or even 20 limit is sensible (with the level set according to the amount of segregation between pavement and road) but otherwise the onus is on the pedestrians or the drivers on side roads to make sure that they do not cause accidents. Any fool can reduce *the effect of* accidents by cutting speed limits, but driver/pedestrian training is the clever solution. The A44 Oxford-Evesham road and the A329 Stadhampton to Thame road are cases in point: the main road where it's safe to do 60 or 70 on the straight carry a 50 limit, whereas the narrow twisty country lanes leading off on either side, where it's often not safe to go above 40, carry a 60 limit. The A415 Abingdon to Berinsfield road has a 30 mph limit almost all the way from Clifton Hampden to Berinsfield, where I would judge 40 on hte bends and 60 on the straights is sensible. There are long-term road-works further west while a cycle track is being made which mostly merit a reduction from 60 to 40 at worst (apart from the rare times when half the road is coned off) but a blanket 30 limit has been imposed. Driving at 30 on a road that previously carried a 60 limit is very hard. Try as I might, I can't keep much below 40 and that feels as if I'm crawling along. Speed limits should be set according to the highest speed that it is safe to drive - a 60 limit on a single-track road with harepin bends is simply taking the ****. I reckon that the speed limit should be set at the speed that a mythical "safe, competant driver" would choose to drive at if there were no speed limits: it's when that driver would choose to drive at 20 mph or more above the actual limit that you get problems with non-compliance. Penalise the serious offenders who think it's safe to drive at 100 on a single carriageway or 60 in a built-up area with parked cars and the likelihood of children emerging from behind them; don't penalise those who drive at 40 in a 30 zone where there is good visibility of hazards. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
Paul Cummins wrote to uk.transport.london on Sat, 19 Feb 2005:
I think it's something to do with the fact that 80% of British dual carriageways are of a better standard that German Autobahnen, but have slower, and often unreasonably slower, speed limits. Well, German Autobahnen may have a speed limit of 130 kph, but in my experience one can almost never go at it - either there's too much traffic, or there are road works, or it's raining..... French autoroutes, now..... and you get a much better drive quality - I can often read on an autoroute, where I certainly can't on the M1 (I've tried!) How am I endangering anyone by doing 80-90 down the M6 at 3am on a clear morning? Do they actually *have* speed cameras on the M6? Mostly, I've only seen them on parts of the motorway where the speed is limited to 70 mph for whatever reason. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
redtube wrote to uk.transport.london on Sat, 19 Feb 2005:
Reason? to catch the motorists out, thats what. Yeah, or perfectly good roads into Brighton, quite safe at 40 mph, suddenly turning into 30 mph without even telling you until you get flashed & penalty points (this one's a very sore point in our family!). -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
"Mrs Redboots" wrote in message
... redtube wrote to uk.transport.london on Sat, 19 Feb 2005: Reason? to catch the motorists out, thats what. Yeah, or perfectly good roads into Brighton, quite safe at 40 mph, suddenly turning into 30 mph without even telling you until you get flashed & penalty points (this one's a very sore point in our family!). Presumably there must be 30 signs to make the speed limit enforceable, but they may not be very obvious. I'd like to see much greater use of 300, 200, 100-yard countdown markers in advance of speed limits, especially where the change of speed limit is 20 or more mph - a sort of "Morpeth rules" for cars. With advance warning of limits (especially where the sign is round a corner or hidden by a hedge until you're very close) you can plan ahead and simply lift off the power to slow down gently rather than having to brake - I always try to slow down by coming off the power if I can, but that's the advanced driver in me ;-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
Martin Underwood ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying : Yes, a lot of main roads near where I live (Oxfordshire) have recently been downgraded to 50 (or are about to be downgraded) "to reduce the number of traffic accidents". This is solving the right problem in the wrong way: to avoid collisions, you need to penalise the person who *causes* the accident, typically a driver who is on a minor road who pulls out into fast-moving traffic without assessing its speed or the pedestrian who crosses the road without regard for the traffic, rather than penalising (by imposing a draconian speed limit) the driver who is in the right and who has priority. Children are a special case, and a 40, 30 or even 20 limit is sensible (with the level set according to the amount of segregation between pavement and road) but otherwise the onus is on the pedestrians or the drivers on side roads to make sure that they do not cause accidents. Any fool can reduce *the effect of* accidents by cutting speed limits, but driver/pedestrian training is the clever solution. applause |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
Martin Underwood wrote to uk.transport.london on Sat, 19 Feb 2005:
Presumably there must be 30 signs to make the speed limit enforceable, but they may not be very obvious. I think so - I always do keep an eye out for such things when I'm in the car (as a non-driver, it's easier for me to navigate & warn of cameras, speed limits, etc) and I certainly never saw it. I'd like to see much greater use of 300, 200, 100-yard countdown markers in advance of speed limits, especially where the change of speed limit is 20 or more mph - a sort of "Morpeth rules" for cars. With advance warning of limits (especially where the sign is round a corner or hidden by a hedge until you're very close) you can plan ahead and simply lift off the power to slow down gently rather than having to brake - I always try to slow down by coming off the power if I can, but that's the advanced driver in me ;-) I think most people who have been driving for any length of time do, no? -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 23 January 2005 with new photos |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Speed Camera Avoidance
"Mrs Redboots" wrote in message
... Martin Underwood wrote to uk.transport.london on Sat, 19 Feb 2005: Presumably there must be 30 signs to make the speed limit enforceable, but they may not be very obvious. I think so - I always do keep an eye out for such things when I'm in the car (as a non-driver, it's easier for me to navigate & warn of cameras, speed limits, etc) and I certainly never saw it. I'd like to see much greater use of 300, 200, 100-yard countdown markers in advance of speed limits, especially where the change of speed limit is 20 or more mph - a sort of "Morpeth rules" for cars. With advance warning of limits (especially where the sign is round a corner or hidden by a hedge until you're very close) you can plan ahead and simply lift off the power to slow down gently rather than having to brake - I always try to slow down by coming off the power if I can, but that's the advanced driver in me ;-) I think most people who have been driving for any length of time do, no? Actually no. Following behind cars, I very often see them brake where I don't - not because I take the bend any faster but because I've planned ahead. When I was a passenger with one driver recently I was surreptitiously watching and his right foot was permanently on either the accelerator or the brake - he never lifted off the power and just let the car slow down by friction. Admittedly it was in an automatic and you get less engine braking with them, but even so... I dread to think how quickly he goes through brake pads :-( |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New camera scam | London Transport | |||
Lights, camera, Becktion! | London Transport | |||
"Camera Enforcement" on Tower Bridge | London Transport | |||
Caught driving on a bus lane by camera - what to do? | London Transport | |||
Camera like sensors on top of traffic lights | London Transport |