| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 6th 09, 12:14 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case is pending?
I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. |
|
#2
February 6th 09, 12:34 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
On 6 Feb, 13:29, Paul Corfield wrote: On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:14:01 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. I'm pleased someone's got round to saying this. * I concur with the above. Ditto. |
|
#3
February 6th 09, 12:36 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
"John Rowland" gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying: I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. Hmm. If the subject of a similar thread wasn't a poster here, would that stop discussion? |
|
#4
February 6th 09, 12:46 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:14:01 -0000, "John Rowland" wrote: I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. I'm pleased someone's got round to saying this. I concur with the above. Yes. although the stuff about types of emergency vehicles is interesting. I didn't know there were cave rescue services! tom -- Lilith doesn't exist, but it's an interesting story. |
|
#5
February 6th 09, 01:06 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
What case?
B2003 |
|
#6
February 6th 09, 01:12 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
On Feb 6, 2:06*pm, wrote:
What case? Just found it. Hmm. B2003 |
|
#7
February 6th 09, 04:10 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case is pending?
wrote:
I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. What case pending? So far as I've read, there is no prosecution happening or planned. (my first post on this matter). |
|
#8
February 6th 09, 04:32 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
On 6 Feb, 14:12, wrote:
On Feb 6, 2:06*pm, wrote: What case? Just found it. Hmm. B2003 do share. |
|
#9
February 6th 09, 05:25 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case ispending?
On 6 Feb, 17:10, "Andrew Heenan" wrote: wrote: I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. What case pending? So far as I've read, there is no prosecution happening or planned. (my first post on this matter). Why reply to my post when what you quote is what the starter of this thread (John Rowland) said? |
|
#10
February 6th 09, 05:59 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we please stop discussing Mr Rosenstiel while the case is pending?
"Andrew Heenan" wrote in message ... wrote: I know I was the first to comment, and my comment was derogatory without being in any way informative, but now that Colin has revealed legal reasons why he can not comment on the case, I think it's very ungentlemanly for us to sit here speculating away like crazy while Colin sits gagged in the corner. What case pending? So far as I've read, there is no prosecution happening or planned. (my first post on this matter). There is no prosecution but the Standards Committee of Cambridge City Council will be meeting on Wednesday 11th to decide what punishment to impose. Peter Smyth |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| "can I see your ticket please sir?" | London Transport | |||
| Tube maps - get them while you can! | London Transport | |||
| Some Questions - can anyone help me here, please? | London Transport | |||
| Can Someone Please Explain this picture? | London Transport | |||
| Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it | London Transport | |||
Linear Mode
