London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 11:21 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2005
Posts: 202
Default 02-28-2005 at Moorgate

Dave Arquati wrote:
Dave Newt wrote:

James Farrar wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:20:14 +0000, Dave Newt
wrote:

It's hardly far though - about a 4 minute walk from IC's [1] main
entrance. I used to quite like walking there down the back of
Southside, along the mews, right to the end where you cut through
the archway in the wall, and then turn L-R-L-R down to where the
Hans Place (?) side of Harrods is.

Another nice walk is via the churchyard at the back of Brompton
Oratory.


I lived in Linstead for a year (lucky me) so that was my favoured
route out, of course.



I'll see your Linstead and raise you Fisher.

[1] I don't work there any more, so I can freely ignore the new
style guide :-)


Ignore Sykes. That's what I do. Save the comma!



To be fair to him, he was always very nice and interested in what I
had to say on the two or three occasions I "officially" met him. It's
the brand implementers who tend to be amongst the most clueless I
find... (and not just there either...)



I've given up caring about the comma... half the people I talk to
outside uni haven't even heard of the place, let alone care about the
comma!


Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7

Your sig is non style-compliant - report to Level 3 of the lego building
immediately! :-)

Count yourself lucky anyway - my new workplace also includes font face,
size and colour in the house style for EMAIL. I've tried explaining, but
to no avail. No wonder half my outbound mail goes in the recipients'
spambucket.

  #62   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 11:59 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,429
Default 02-28-2005 at Moorgate

Dave Arquati wrote:
Dave Newt wrote:
James Farrar wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:20:14 +0000, Dave Newt
wrote:

It's hardly far though - about a 4 minute walk from IC's [1] main
entrance. I used to quite like walking there down the back of
Southside, along the mews, right to the end where you cut
through the archway in the wall, and then turn L-R-L-R down to
where the
Hans Place (?) side of Harrods is.

Another nice walk is via the churchyard at the back of Brompton
Oratory.

I lived in Linstead for a year (lucky me) so that was my favoured
route out, of course.


I'll see your Linstead and raise you Fisher.

[1] I don't work there any more, so I can freely ignore the new
style guide :-)

Ignore Sykes. That's what I do. Save the comma!


To be fair to him, he was always very nice and interested in what
I had to say on the two or three occasions I "officially" met him.
It's the brand implementers who tend to be amongst the most
clueless I find... (and not just there either...)


I've given up caring about the comma... half the people I talk to
outside uni haven't even heard of the place, let alone care about
the comma!


Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where
this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for
the uninitiated?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

  #63   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 12:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2005
Posts: 202
Default 02-28-2005 at Moorgate

Richard J. wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote:

Dave Newt wrote:

James Farrar wrote:


On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:20:14 +0000, Dave Newt
wrote:


It's hardly far though - about a 4 minute walk from IC's [1] main
entrance. I used to quite like walking there down the back of
Southside, along the mews, right to the end where you cut
through the archway in the wall, and then turn L-R-L-R down to
where the
Hans Place (?) side of Harrods is.

Another nice walk is via the churchyard at the back of Brompton
Oratory.

I lived in Linstead for a year (lucky me) so that was my favoured
route out, of course.


I'll see your Linstead and raise you Fisher.


[1] I don't work there any more, so I can freely ignore the new
style guide :-)

Ignore Sykes. That's what I do. Save the comma!

To be fair to him, he was always very nice and interested in what
I had to say on the two or three occasions I "officially" met him.
It's the brand implementers who tend to be amongst the most
clueless I find... (and not just there either...)


I've given up caring about the comma... half the people I talk to
outside uni haven't even heard of the place, let alone care about
the comma!



Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where
this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for
the uninitiated?


It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC. The
domain was .ic.ac.uk.

In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be Imperial
College London and that the short version should be Imperial. Use of
..ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT Department had fun trying to
change all the domain servers to .imperial.ac.uk.

However, this creates a false analogy with University College, London,
which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL.

The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called ICL
and that a comma must not be employed when writing the full name
Imperial College London. (The use of IC is "to be actively discouraged
too".)

Actually, the full name was actually Imperial College of Science,
Technology and Medicine. This name is still to be retained for legal
purposes in some situations.

To be honest, I suspect the dropping of ST&M was mainly to raise the
profile of the Business School who just spunked 25 mil up Norman Foster
on a new building.

  #64   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 01:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,158
Default Imperial College (was 02-28-2005 at Moorgate)

Dave Newt wrote:
Richard J. wrote:

Dave Arquati wrote:

Dave Newt wrote:

James Farrar wrote:


On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:20:14 +0000, Dave Newt
wrote:


It's hardly far though - about a 4 minute walk from IC's [1] main
entrance. I used to quite like walking there down the back of
Southside, along the mews, right to the end where you cut
through the archway in the wall, and then turn L-R-L-R down to
where the
Hans Place (?) side of Harrods is.

Another nice walk is via the churchyard at the back of Brompton
Oratory.


I lived in Linstead for a year (lucky me) so that was my favoured
route out, of course.


I'll see your Linstead and raise you Fisher.


[1] I don't work there any more, so I can freely ignore the new
style guide :-)


Ignore Sykes. That's what I do. Save the comma!


To be fair to him, he was always very nice and interested in what
I had to say on the two or three occasions I "officially" met him.
It's the brand implementers who tend to be amongst the most
clueless I find... (and not just there either...)


I've given up caring about the comma... half the people I talk to
outside uni haven't even heard of the place, let alone care about
the comma!




Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out where
this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an explanation for
the uninitiated?



It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC. The
domain was .ic.ac.uk.

In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be Imperial
College London and that the short version should be Imperial. Use of
..ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT Department had fun trying to
change all the domain servers to .imperial.ac.uk.

However, this creates a false analogy with University College, London,
which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL.

The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called ICL
and that a comma must not be employed when writing the full name
Imperial College London. (The use of IC is "to be actively discouraged
too".)

Actually, the full name was actually Imperial College of Science,
Technology and Medicine. This name is still to be retained for legal
purposes in some situations.

To be honest, I suspect the dropping of ST&M was mainly to raise the
profile of the Business School who just spunked 25 mil up Norman Foster
on a new building.


That's probably the dirtiest way I've ever heard anyone describe the
Tanaka Building... (which is on Exhibition Road, to keep this slightly
on topic and relate it to that thread).

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London
  #65   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 01:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2005
Posts: 202
Default Imperial College (was 02-28-2005 at Moorgate)

Dave Arquati wrote:
Dave Newt wrote:


To be honest, I suspect the dropping of ST&M was mainly to raise the
profile of the Business School who just spunked 25 mil up Norman
Foster on a new building.



That's probably the dirtiest way I've ever heard anyone describe the
Tanaka Building... (which is on Exhibition Road, to keep this slightly
on topic and relate it to that thread).


Apologies - I did actually tone it down before hitting send. Er, twice. :-)

Have they managed to get all five new doors working simultaneously yet?


  #66   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 06:55 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2004
Posts: 95
Default Imperial College (was 02-28-2005 at Moorgate)

Have they managed to get all five new doors working simultaneously
yet?

Of course not!

The swipecard front doors are broken and the inner back door doesn't
open fully. I think the only day all 5 sets of doors were working was
when the queen visited.

--
Chris

  #68   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 09:06 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,429
Default Imperial College (was 02-28-2005 at Moorgate)

Dave Newt wrote:
Richard J. wrote:
Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out
where this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an
explanation for the uninitiated?


It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC.
The domain was .ic.ac.uk.

In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be
Imperial College London and that the short version should be
Imperial. Use of .ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT
Department had fun trying to change all the domain servers to
.imperial.ac.uk.

However, this creates a false analogy with University College,
London, which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL.


On UCL's site www.ucl.ac.uk, they use UCL as the name almost
exclusively, even in the history ("175 years ago ... UCL was founded").
Where the name is given in full, I haven't seen one instance on their
site where the comma is included.

The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called
ICL


Quite right too. Some of us have fond memories of a company called ICL,
1968-2002.

Thanks very much for the explanation.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

  #69   Report Post  
Old February 11th 05, 10:17 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2005
Posts: 202
Default Imperial College (was 02-28-2005 at Moorgate)

Richard J. wrote:
Dave Newt wrote:

Richard J. wrote:

Some of us care deeply about commas, and are trying to work out
where this comma is supposed to go, or not go. How about an
explanation for the uninitiated?


It used to be called Imperial College, and was referred to as IC.
The domain was .ic.ac.uk.

In the rebranding, it was decided that the new name should be
Imperial College London and that the short version should be
Imperial. Use of .ic.ac.uk has been proscribed and the ICT
Department had fun trying to change all the domain servers to
.imperial.ac.uk.

However, this creates a false analogy with University College,
London, which has a comma in it and is commonly referred to as UCL.



On UCL's site www.ucl.ac.uk, they use UCL as the name almost
exclusively, even in the history ("175 years ago ... UCL was founded").
Where the name is given in full, I haven't seen one instance on their
site where the comma is included.


You're right - they *must* have changed it. It always was with a comma.

The Imperial branding people specified that it must not be called
ICL



Quite right too. Some of us have fond memories of a company called ICL,
1968-2002.


I think it was the "-2002" part of their history that they wanted to
distance themselves from!
  #70   Report Post  
Old February 12th 05, 01:58 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 515
Default 02-28-2005 at Moorgate

Dave Newt wrote the following in:


snip

Blimey, that all sounds a bit complicated. I wonder if the LSE has such
rules, I'm certainly not aware of them.

To be honest, I suspect the dropping of ST&M was mainly to raise
the profile of the Business School who just spunked 25 mil up
Norman Foster on a new building.


Someone kill that man, he is responsible for the atrocity that is the
central spiral staircase in the LSE library. He also designed the GLA
building which has a similar spiral staircase. Usually the purpose of a
staircase is for people to walk on it, but with the LSE one the main
purpose is so photos of it can be put in university publicity. I firmly
believe that the designer of these things has never tried to walk on
them.

--
message by Robin May.
Drinking Special Brew will get you drunk in much the same way that
going to prison will give you a roof over your head and free meals.

http://robinmay.fotopic.net


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2005 fares leaflet Matthew London Transport 15 November 3rd 04 05:33 PM
Carnets do make it into 2005 fares Gerard McGovern London Transport 1 November 2nd 04 01:18 PM
Carnet tickets available in 2005? Jason London Transport 1 October 19th 04 04:50 PM
New 2005 Fares -- Children Marc Brett London Transport 0 September 28th 04 05:03 PM
Blockade of cross London Thameslink services from Saturday 11th September 2004 until 2005 Robin Mayes London Transport 42 September 21st 04 03:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017