Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Roland Perry wrote:
airside We have to come up with a better term for this! I think i've seen fare-paid used in this way, but it's not as snappy. How about railside? tom -- YOU CANT TAKE AWAY HATGUYS HAT. THEN HE IS JUST GUY -- The_Toad |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at
14:14:48 on Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Tom Anderson remarked: airside We have to come up with a better term for this! I think i've seen fare-paid used in this way, but it's not as snappy. How about railside? I use "airside" because restrictions initially imposed at airports (and which establish these boundaries) tend to trickle down into the rest of our lives, and the term is fairly well understood. -- Roland Perry |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb, 11:36, Roland Perry wrote:
There's a lift to a mid level by the metropolitan line stairs (the set leading from the tube ticket hall) Yes, but the level it goes to is not deep enough to be called a "sub-basement. If there was a sub-basement, that lift could be extended (downwards), assuming the sub-basement extended to whole width of the gatelines (and the lifts down to the Northern Line are at the opposite end). "Sub basement" in the sense of being below (ie. "sub") the basement level (ie. the ticket office level). http://www.perry.co.uk/images/kx-composite-b.jpg So where the red-circle is. No. Diagonally southeast of there. At the corner of the ticket hall Can you give an X/Y grid reference (where the red dot is 3.4 across and 4.2 up)? http://www.perry.co.uk/images/kx-composite-c.jpg 5 along by 3 up. |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 07:44:09 on Sat, 7 Feb 2009, lonelytraveller remarked: http://www.perry.co.uk/images/kx-composite-c.jpg 5 along by 3 up. Thanks. (But isn't that quite a long way from the recently closed corridor?) -- Roland Perry |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb, 16:07, Roland Perry wrote:
http://www.perry.co.uk/images/kx-composite-c.jpg 5 along by 3 up. Thanks. (But isn't that quite a long way from the recently closed corridor?) No, its right in the middle of it, approximately at the point where it turned left to go up a few steps to go to the second part of the corridor (which had a couple of phones, and a sock shop, and the junction with the branch to the side exit steps, which have been disused for the last year or so) |
#116
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 08:21:20 on Sat, 7 Feb 2009, lonelytraveller remarked: http://www.perry.co.uk/images/kx-composite-c.jpg 5 along by 3 up. Thanks. (But isn't that quite a long way from the recently closed corridor?) No, its right in the middle of it, approximately at the point where it turned left to go up a few steps to go to the second part of the corridor (which had a couple of phones, and a sock shop, and the junction with the branch to the side exit steps, which have been disused for the last year or so) So you are saying the first leg of that corridor is aligned approx "4 O'clock" from the ticket office (ie parallel to the Victoria Line escalators? It feels to me more like "2 o'clock", but it's easy to get disorientated under ground. -- Roland Perry |
#117
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb, 14:14, Tom Anderson wrote:
I think i've seen fare-paid used in this way, but it's not as snappy. Paid and unpaid [areas/passageways/etc] are common in official documents. U |
#118
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 14:14:48 on Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Tom Anderson remarked: airside We have to come up with a better term for this! I think i've seen fare-paid used in this way, but it's not as snappy. How about railside? I use "airside" because restrictions initially imposed at airports (and which establish these boundaries) tend to trickle down into the rest of our lives, and the term is fairly well understood. Oh, absolutely! It's immediately obvious what the term means. There's just this little bit of my brain that complains every time i read or write it! tom -- YOU CANT TAKE AWAY HATGUYS HAT. THEN HE IS JUST GUY -- The_Toad |
#119
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb, 16:53, Roland Perry wrote:
So you are saying the first leg of that corridor is aligned approx "4 O'clock" from the ticket office (ie parallel to the Victoria Line escalators? It feels to me more like "2 o'clock", but it's easy to get disorientated under ground. Now here's an interesting image: http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/kxpem/images/KX_lul_3.jpg The curved passageway on the left is the one that's closing, and it does start by heading east. There's what appears to be a lift at the north end of the tube ticket hall stairs, and an opening in the north wall on the paid side of the ticket barrier that could also be a lift, and appears to very near to the curved passageway. I'd reckon the latter is the Northern Line lift. Here's another diagram: http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/kxpem/images/KX_lul_2.jpg There's a blue square that looks to be in the same place as that supposed lift. And it shows the relative positions of the passageways to the above ground stations. U |
#120
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you are saying the first leg of that corridor is aligned approx "4
O'clock" from the ticket office (ie parallel to the Victoria Line escalators? It feels to me more like "2 o'clock", but it's easy to get disorientated under ground. http://planningonline.camden.gov.uk/...df&pageCount=1 Page 5 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chaos likely when they close ticket windows at King's Cross St. Pancras | London Transport | |||
Chaos likely when they close ticket windows at King's Cross St. Pancras | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport | |||
King's Cross Thameslink validators | London Transport | |||
king's cross | London Transport |